Prime Minister Yair Lapid has given away the farm, or more precisely, Israel's maritime territory, and what did the country receive in return? A slap in the face as Lebanon took everything that was gifted to them and moved the goalposts by disagreeing to prior agreed Israeli security and compensation requirements.
Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
In response, Defense Minister Benny Ganz, who had also agreed to the terms of a bad deal, put the Israeli Defense Forces on high alert. Now Israeli decision-makers are preparing various potential military scenarios, over renewed tensions with Lebanon, with both defensive and offensive operations.
One of the altered Lebanese clauses demands that Total Energy – the French energy conglomerate that holds the license for both Israel's Karish rig and Lebanon's future drilling rig – buy a portion of the reservoir in the waters that Israel was about to surrender to Lebanon.
This is a Lebanese admission that the disputed waters are indeed, at least partly, Israeli sovereign maritime territory which Lapid and Ganz are about to gift to them in return for a low percentage of royalties if, or when, Lebanon is capable of drilling from a future rig.
Israel has informed the United States, acting as liaison negotiators in a deal, and whom many see as favoring Lebanon over Israel, that it opposes the Lebanese changes in what is considered by many in the country as an already bad deal.
United States officials, and perhaps people at the top of Israel's echelon, seem not to comprehend or are ignoring who are the decision-makers in Lebanon. They primarily include the leader of the Lebanese Parliament and the religious Iranian proxy Hezbollah who are Lebanese twins, joined at the hip by their Shiite connections.
Everyone is familiar with Hassan Nasrallah, the turbaned Hezbollah leader. But not many people are aware of the intimate link between this Iranian-backed terrorist firebrand and the refined, suited, elderly stateman, Nabih Berri, Speaker of the Lebanese Parliament since 1992 and, equally significantly, the head of the Lebanese Shiite Amal Movement.
One of the shocking revelations made at the recent ICT World Summit on Counter-Terrorism at Herzliya was the depth and breadth of Hezbollah's money laundering and business enterprises in South America, and how their expanding family and clan ties strengthen the spread of their legitimate and criminal enterprises, including how they have certain corrupt leaders of several Central and South American countries in their pocket.
To suggest that Hezbollah is a separate part of Lebanon's cultural and political life is to misunderstand Lebanon. To suggest that Israel, through a US proxy, is negotiating with the Lebanese government, and not with Hassan Nasrallah, is a fatal mistake.
To say that Hezbollah will not be a recipient of future natural gas revenue is delusional. I repeat, they are joined at the hip with Amal, and Amal and Hezbollah control what happens in Lebanon.
An unconsidered result of Israel's surrender of its legitimate maritime rights to Lebanon is what will happen if the quantity or quality of the gas is not substantially profitable, and no drilling takes place. This means that Israel will have gifted Lebanon its maritime territory for nothing because there will be no compensation based on energy production to be paid to Israel.
This deal will not be a water for peace deal and the Israeli Karish rig will be even more exposed to Hezbollah aggression on maritime waters gifted freely to Lebanon much closer to the Israeli rig than before. And to think that, when the terms of this deal were being finalized, Ganz said that "this deal harms Iran's interests."
How wrong can he be? If there is sufficient gas to make a Lebanese rig profitable then Amal-Hezbollah will be major recipient of the profits. And until or instead of drilling, Lebanon's new Mediterranean territory will be infinitely closer to Israel's Karish gas rig.
Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!
Although Yair Lapid said there was no need for this troublesome deal to be authorized by the Knesset hopefully saner voices will be heard. Israeli law only required that international agreements be submitted to the Knesset for review, not a vote of approval. However, historically, agreements regarding territorial changes have been brought to the Knesset legislature for a vote.
If this deal translates to Lapid/Ganz gifting strategic expanses of the Mediterranean to Amal and Hezbollah, and still being treated like an unrecognized pariah enemy, it is the equivalent of these Israeli leaders gifting huge chunks of Judea & Samaria to Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas, our land version of Amal and Hezbollah in Lebanon.
This is the reason that the country will be in an uproar if they push this deal forward without the issue being brought to the Knesset for a debate and a vote.
With an upcoming election in November, Israel is sailing into stormy waters.
