Tamar Sternthal

Tamar Sternthal is director of the Israel office of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA).

AP answers the call of 'Palestine coverage' crusaders

"Expand the reach of factual reporting," promises the news agency, even as it suppresses information contradicting the favored anti-Israel narrative.

 

The Associated Press, a leading news agency whose stated mission is "advancing the power of facts" with "world-class journalism," on Monday appeared to have taken a page out of the open letter signed this month by hundreds of journalists against ethical journalism.

Follow Israel Hayom on Facebook and Twitter 

The letter signatories seek to replace factual reporting with a partisan, anti-Israel agenda falsely painting Israel as a criminal, apartheid state and Palestinians as blameless victims of Israeli oppression ("From journalists to journalists: Why reporting on Palestine has to change").

"We have failed our audiences with a narrative that obscures the most fundamental aspects of the story: Israel's military occupation and its system of apartheid," charge the media crusaders. "We are calling on journalists to tell the full, contextualized truth without fear or favor, to recognize that obfuscating Israel's oppression of Palestinians fails this industry's own objectivity standards." The "contextualized truth," of course, is Israel's alleged apartheid nature and military occupation.

AP heeded the call, on Monday funneling information through the prism of military occupation, discarding inconvenient facts that failed to serve the cause of "the Palestinian people," as the letter puts it.

The closing lines of an otherwise fair and objective report by Laurie Kellman, Matthew Lee and Ellen Knickmeyer ("Blinken, Lapid meet in Rome amid reset US-Israel relations") editorializes:

"Biden has moved to reverse Netanyahu-backed Trump policies that alienated the Palestinians, and the administration has said Israelis and Palestinians should enjoy equal measures of security and prosperity.

"But the US has yet to explain how it intends to bring that about without ending Israel's half-century military occupation of the West Bank, its blockade on Hamas-ruled Gaza and discriminatory policies in Jerusalem that fueled a spring of unrest."

This is an extremely partisan formulation. It completely ignores the following obstacles to security: Palestinian demands for a so-called "right of return" of refugees and their millions of descendants, which fair observers understand as an existential threat to the only Jewish state; Palestinian rejectionism of Israel as a Jewish state and the consistent Palestinians rejection of offer after offer of a Palestinian state alongside Israel; Palestinian denial of any historic Jewish connection to the land, including its most holy site in Jerusalem; government-backed incitement calling for attacks on Israeli civilians; Palestinian Authority payments to terrorists and their families; Palestinian investment in terror infrastructure such as rockets and tunnels at the expense of investment in its civilians; Palestinian rocket-firing on Israeli civilians and arson attacks on southern Israel; Hamas camps that brainwash a generation of kids to admire suicide bombers and other terrorists; and so on.

All of these points feature Palestinian actions as obstacles to conflict resolution. Every single one of them counters the "full, contextualized truth" as the media crusaders, including one  anonymous AP journalist, see it, and thus, they believe, have no place in reporting on behalf of the Palestinian narrative.

"Expand the reach of factual reporting," promises the AP, even as it suppresses information contradicting the favored anti-Israel narrative.

Subscribe to Israel Hayom's daily newsletter and never miss our top stories!

"The free exchange of information has been replaced with the free expungement of inconvenient information," wrote this media critic last week in The New York Daily News, weighing on the open letter's heavily partisan agenda as anathema to ethical journalism.

"Label advocacy and commentary," exhorts the Society of Professional Journalists' Code of Ethics. Turn news into advocacy, counter the unethical practitioners. And the Associated Press, quietly laying aside its longstanding commitment to factual reporting, obliged.

Featured on JNS.org, this article was first published by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis.

Related Posts