A senior Northern Command officer emphasized in closed discussions today (Tuesday) that maintaining strategic positions in Lebanese territory remains critical for defending Metula and the northern border. These positions, situated at key elevations commanding significant areas along the border, will ensure decisive tactical advantages and strengthen defensive capabilities against potential Hezbollah attacks on the northern city, including protection from long-range fire.
In parallel developments, plans are advancing for a sophisticated new barrier along the northern border, superseding the original concept of a simple wall. This enhanced barrier will incorporate advanced anti-vehicle crossing measures, mirroring the recent security infrastructure installed along the Syrian border. The project represents a comprehensive approach to addressing evolving security challenges posed by Hezbollah.
The impact of recent conflicts is starkly visible in Lebanese villages adjacent to the border fence, where residents remain displaced from their homes. While reconstruction in Lebanese territory is expected to be a lengthy process, Israeli forces maintain heightened vigilance as the ceasefire approaches its conclusion in three and a half weeks. Military assessments indicate that any renewed confrontations or violations by Hezbollah could necessitate resumed operations within Lebanon.

Military sources clarify that while the extended presence in Lebanon post-ceasefire remains a political decision, the IDF stands fully prepared for all contingencies and will maintain northern border security through whatever means necessary. The military continues monitoring agreement compliance through American intermediaries, sharing intelligence with Lebanese armed forces while evaluating their capacity to enforce agreement terms. Current assessments suggest the Lebanese military will face significant challenges meeting force deployment requirements within the specified timeframe, given their resource constraints and competing priorities, particularly along the Syrian border.
Hezbollah parliament member Mahmoud Qamati issued what appeared to be both a threat and possibly a sign of acquiescence when stating: "On day 61, the situation changes. Forces remaining in Lebanese territory will be considered occupation forces." This declaration, while seemingly confrontational, might also indicate Hezbollah's tacit acceptance of the current ceasefire implementation, even as Israel maintains an operational presence in Lebanon during the ceasefire period.
Expanding on his previous statement, Hezbollah Political Council Deputy Chief Qamati warned that post-60-day IDF presence would be treated as occupation, promising an appropriate response. "Our patience extends 60 days. Day 61 brings change. Forces in Lebanon become occupiers, and we will respond accordingly," he stated. Qamati further addressed internal Lebanese political dynamics, warning that discussions of Hezbollah disarmament would "plunge the country into chaos."
The immediate future will prove decisive in determining whether the current ceasefire solidifies into lasting stability or marks a turning point toward renewed conflict along the northern border. Both sides maintain operational readiness, acknowledging the precarious nature of the situation and its potential for rapid deterioration.