Report: David's Sling defense system's debut failed due to ‎technical issues ‎

Israel's David's Sling air defense system ‎operational debut failed due to incorrect activation ‎compounded by technical malfunctions, the Air ‎Defense Command's initial investigation has found. ‎

The system was used for the first time last week, ‎when two interceptors were launched as a ‎precaution against ballistic missiles fired within ‎neighboring Syria. Both missed their mark, ‎triggering concerns that David's Sling, which was deployed in April, was declared operational too soon.‎

David's Sling, which counters medium- to long-range ‎‎projectiles, is part of Israel's multi-tiered air ‎‎defense system. It is designed to complement the ‎‎Iron Dome defense system, which regularly destroys short-range rockets and artillery ‎‎shells, the Arrow 2 short- and medium-range ‎‎ballistic missile interceptor, and the Arrow 3 long-range missile interceptor.‎

The inquiry into last week's incident found that ‎David's Sling operators had only seconds to decide ‎whether or not to launch the ‎interceptors and ‎decided to do so. ‎

Early reports suggested ‎that the interceptor's ‎trajectory had somehow changed in midair, causing ‎them to hit Syrian soil a few hundred feet inside ‎the border. The Air Defense Command's probe, ‎however, concluded that one interceptor exploded ‎mid-flight while the other landed on the Syrian side ‎of the border. ‎

The premise leading the investigation was that ‎during the incident, David's Sling had experienced a ‎technical failure. The team tasked by Air Force ‎Commander Maj. Gen. Amikam Norkin to review the ‎incident found that while that was, to some extent, ‎the case, the team operating the system had also ‎failed to activate it correctly.‎

Much of the investigation remains classified, but a ‎senior Israeli Air Force official told the Walla ‎News website Sunday that "one we substantiated the initial ‎findings we felt it was important to bring it to the ‎public's attention. Various changes were made based ‎on these findings to ensure similar incidents do not ‎recur."‎

David's Sling, he stressed, "is a unique, first-of-its-kind system in many ways and it was designed to ‎deal with specific, serious threats. The soldiers ‎and officers manning this system are some of the ‎most capable, professional personnel the IAF has."‎

The IDF Spokesman issued a statement saying, "On ‎July 23, two Syrian SS-21 rockets were identified by ‎Israeli air defenses as threatening to ‎undermine Israeli sovereignty and its citizens. ‎Following the identification, two David's Sling ‎interceptors were launched at the rockets' ‎direction. ‎

‎"In recent days, a comprehensive operational ‎investigation was conducted by the IAF, which ‎concluded that the decision-making process – given ‎the nature of the threat and taking into account the ‎short window [of time] – was correct. The technical ‎aspects of the incident are classified and cannot be ‎released for security purposes. ‎

‎"The lessons learned from the incident will be ‎implemented by the Air Defense Command and the ‎system's operators, who remain on a high level of ‎operational readiness meant to protect the security ‎of Israel and the public," the military's statement ‎said. ‎

Some in the defense establishment, however, lamented ‎what they called "jumping to conclusions." ‎

‎"This seems to be a case of human error with respect ‎to making the decision to deploy David's Sling," one ‎official told Channel 12.‎

‎"This doesn't look like technical issues. Jumping to ‎this conclusion is unfortunate," he said. ‎